Current:Home > 新闻中心Southern California rocked by series of earthquakes: Is a bigger one brewing? -Lighthouse Finance Hub
Southern California rocked by series of earthquakes: Is a bigger one brewing?
Surpassing Quant Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-09 11:46:02
An earthquake and dozens of aftershocks rattled Southern Californians starting on Tuesday night and continuing into Wednesday morning. Could a bigger one be on the way?
As a general rule, the risk is fairly low. About 5% to 10% of all California earthquakes are followed by a larger one within a week, and the probability of a larger quake depends on how much aftershock activity there is, according to the USGS. Lots of aftershock activity doesn't guarantee a bigger quake, however.
This latest quake certainly has aftershock activity. A magnitude 5.2 quake at 9:09 p.m. in Lamont, California, near Bakersfield was felt as far away as Los Angeles, over 100 miles from the epicenter. Since then, the U.S. Geological Survey has recorded dozens of aftershocks ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 in magnitude, none as large as the initial quake.
But experts say there's no real way to tell whether a large quake is going to be followed by something bigger – until after it happens.
"We have never found any characteristic that makes a quake more likely to be a foreshock," said seismologist Lucy Jones in a social media post.
There isn't a known fault in the area where the earthquake struck on Tuesday night, but it's still an area known for earthquakes, said Ole Kaven, U.S. Geological Survey research geophysicist.
As time goes on, the chances of a bigger quake go down, but the swarm of aftershocks does raise some eyebrows.
"Because of the productive nature of the aftershock sequence, the chance of another shock 5.0 or greater is a slightly higher," Kaven said. "It’s an interesting event in a place you don’t normally expect it, but it is certainly earthquake country so we need to be prepared for the possibility."
What is an aftershock? A foreshock?
When an earthquake is followed by one or more quakes smaller in size in the same area, the later quakes are called aftershocks.
But when an earthquake is followed by a larger one, the first quake becomes known as a foreshock.
One last term: The largest quake in a sequence is the mainshock.
Complicating matters: It's not fully possible to identity a mainshock until after the fact — you have to wait to see if a larger quake comes.
Have large foreshocks happened in California before?
About half of California's biggest earthquakes in history have been preceded by foreshocks. California's increased seismic activity compared to elsewhere in the U.S. makes it more likely for large quakes to occur in sequence, but the relative rarity of large earthquakes still makes it unlikely.
A sequence of small quakes that began rattling the morning of July 4, 2019, ended up being foreshocks to two of the state's largest earthquakes in two decades, according to scientists at Stanford. Later that morning, a 6.4 near Ridgecrest, California, prompted evacuations and caused fires to break out. The next day, a 7.1 earthquake struck the same area.
Research into one of California's largest earthquakes in history, the 1857 Fort Tejon quake that hit with a magnitude of about 7.9, shows that there were at least two widely felt foreshocks of between a 5 and 6 magnitude in the hours leading up to the mainshock.
San Francisco's catastrophic 1906 earthquake came roughly 20-25 seconds after a foreshock was felt throughout the city.
WHEN CAN YOU FEEL AN EARTHQUAKE?Quake magnitudes explained.
When will 'The Big One' hit?
The infamous but elusive possibility of a devastatingly large earthquake known as "The Big One" always comes to mind when a significant quake strikes in California.
But there's actually several devastating quakes that will eventually hit the state.
The USGS estimates that within the next three decades, there's about a 46% chance an earthquake of magnitude 7 will hit in the Los Angeles area, and a 51% chance it will happen in the Bay Area.
The chances of a 7.5 magnitude quake are 31% in the Los Angeles area and 20% in the San Francisco area in the next 30 years.
Read more.
Contributing: Beth Weise and Joel Shannon, USA TODAY
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Blake Lively’s Inner Circle Shares Rare Insight on Her Life as a Mom to 4 Kids
- Striking Hollywood scribes ponder AI in the writer's room
- 'Shy' follows the interior monologue of a troubled teen boy
- All the Revelations Explored in Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- 'Wait Wait' for April 29, 2023: Live from Nashville!
- Becky G Reveals How Fiancé Sebastian Lletget Challenges Her in the Best Way
- Paris Hilton Reflects on Decision to Have an Abortion in Her 20s
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- PEN America gala honors Salman Rushdie, his first in-person appearance since stabbing
Ranking
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Yes, Dry Shampoo for Lashes Is a Thing: Here’s Why You Need It
- The Masked Singer: Find Out the '80s Pop Icon and Comedian-Turned-TV Host Who Were Sent Home
- Abbott Elementary Sneak Peek: The School Staff Is Heading on the Road
- Sam Taylor
- In 'Book Club: The Next Chapter,' the ladies live, laugh, and love in Italy
- A new 'Fatal Attraction' is definitely aware of your critiques of the original
- Flash Deal: Get 2 MAC Cosmetics Mascaras for Less Than the Price of 1
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $280 Crossbody Bag for Just $59
U.S.-Italian national Elly Schlein, who campaigned for Obama, becomes 1st woman to lead Italy's Democratic Party
Shop the Best Under $60 Denim Jeans From Levi's, Abercrombie, H&M, Urban Outfitters & More
Olympic women's basketball bracket: Schedule, results, Team USA's path to gold
How U.S., Afghan governments failed to adequately train Afghan security forces after spending $90 billion over 20 years
Weird Al on accordions, bathrooms, and getting turned down by Prince
Martha Stewart is the oldest cover model ever for a 'Sports Illustrated' swim issue