Current:Home > NewsSpecial counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case -Lighthouse Finance Hub
Special counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case
View
Date:2025-04-18 19:21:47
Washington — Special counsel Jack Smith filed a blistering motion in response to former President Donald Trump's request that the judge overseeing his federal 2020 election interference criminal case recuse herself.
"There is no valid basis, under the relevant law and facts, for the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, to disqualify herself in this proceeding," Smith wrote in a 20-page filing an hour before a deadline set by Chutkan to respond.
- Trump's 4 indictments in detail: A quick-look guide to charges, trial dates and key players for each case
He said that in seeking Chutkan's recusal, Trump "both takes out of context the Court's words from prior judicial proceedings and misstates the proper legal standards governing judicial recusals."
Smith also argued that Trump "cherry-picks" from two of Chutkan's sentencing hearings for two Capitol riot defendants, and in both cases, "the Court was appropriately responding to—and ultimately rejecting— a common argument raised by scores of January 6 offenders: that they deserved leniency because their actions were inspired by, or were not as serious as, those of others who contributed to the riot but had not been held responsible—including former president Donald J. Trump, the defendant in this case."
Trump's lawyers asked in a filing Monday that Chutkan remove herself from the case because of previous statements she had made in two separate Capitol riot sentencing hearings.
"Judge Chutkan has, in connection with other cases, suggested that President Trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned," Trump's lawyers wrote in their request. "Such statements, made before this case began and without due process, are inherently disqualifying."
They highlighted statements she made about the former president, including telling one Capitol riot defendant in October 2022 that the violent attempt to overthrow the government came from "blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day."
"The public meaning of this statement is inescapable — President Trump is free, but should not be," Trump's attorneys wrote.
But in his filing, Smith provided more extensive transcripts of the remarks Judge Chutkan had made in the two Capitol riot sentencing hearings to make the argument that the full transcripts show that she "did not state that [Trump] was legally or morally culpable for the events of January 6 or that he deserved punishment," but rather, that "the Court was engaged in its judicial responsibility to hear, acknowledge, and respond to [the Jan. 6 defendant's] sentencing allocution."
Addressing the emphasis placed by Trump's recusal motion on this phrase, "it's a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day," Smith wrote, "From this simple statement of uncontroverted fact, the defendant purports to draw the 'inescapable' message that the Court believes that defendant Trump should be imprisoned. But the only inescapable thing about the Court's comment is that it stated an uncontested and accurate fact in response to a mitigation argument that the Court had heard many times before."
Smith argued Trump has not proven Chutkan made biased claims because he "must show that they display a deep-seated animosity toward him."
"The defendant cannot meet this heavy burden," Smith wrote.
"Because the defendant cannot point to any statements expressing actual bias, all he can say—and he says it repeatedly—is that the Court's comments 'suggest' some sort of bias or prejudice toward the defendant," Smith added.
Ultimately, it is up to Chutkan to decide whether her past statements create the perception of bias. A new judge would be assigned to the case if she recuses. Trump's attorneys could petition an appeals court to require her to recuse, but such efforts are often not successful.
Trump will be able to respond to Smith's counter-argument, and his deadline to do so is next week.
Fin Gomez and Graham Kates contributed to this report.
- In:
- Donald Trump
- United States Department of Justice
- Jack Smith
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital. Reach her at caitlin.yilek@cbsinteractive.com. Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hausofcait
TwitterveryGood! (82)
Related
- Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear ready to campaign for Harris-Walz after losing out for spot on the ticket
- Even without answers, Andy Reid finds his focus after Chiefs' Super Bowl parade shooting
- Small business owners report growing optimism about the U.S. economy
- Flames menace multiple towns as wildfire grows into one of the largest in Texas history
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Patrick Schwarzenegger's Birthday Message to Fiancée Abby Champion Will Warm Your Heart
- James Beard Foundation honors 'beloved' local restaurants with America's Classics: See who won
- Paulina Porizkova, model, writer and advocate for embracing aging, is a Woman of the Year honoree
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Free People's It Girl Quilted Carryall Is Finally Back in Stock! Get It Before It Sells Out
Ranking
- Immigration issues sorted, Guatemala runner Luis Grijalva can now focus solely on sports
- NFLPA team report cards 2024: Chiefs rank 31st as Clark Hunt gets lowest mark among owners
- This ‘Love is Blind’ contestant's shocked reaction to his fiancée went viral. Can attraction grow?
- Freight train carrying corn derails near Amtrak stop in northeast Nevada, no injuries reported
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- New York AG says meat producing giant made misleading environmental claims to boost sales
- What is leap day? Is 2024 a leap year? Everything you need to know about Feb. 29
- How does IVF actually work? Plus what the process is like and how much it costs.
Recommendation
NCAA hands former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh a 4-year show cause order for recruiting violations
MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference continues to make strides in data acceptance
Panera agrees to $2 million settlement for delivery fees: How to see if you're owed money
Sen. Mitch McConnell's retirement raises question: When is the right time to step back?
Judge says Mexican ex-official tried to bribe inmates in a bid for new US drug trial
Here's a big reason why people may be gloomy about the economy: the cost of money
Are you eligible for Walmart's weighted groceries $45 million settlement? What to know
An Ohio city is marking 30 years since the swearing-in of former US Treasurer Mary Ellen Withrow