Current:Home > MarketsA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -Lighthouse Finance Hub
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-19 19:33:42
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (579)
Related
- Louisiana high court temporarily removes Judge Eboni Johnson Rose from Baton Rouge bench amid probe
- These evangelicals are voting their values — by backing Kamala Harris
- Kaitlyn Bristowe Reveals Why She and Ex Jason Tartick Are No Longer Sharing Custody of Their 2 Dogs
- Hayden Panettiere breaks silence on younger brother's death: 'I lost half my soul'
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Officials identify 2 men killed in Idaho gas station explosion
- A Trump Debate Comment About German Energy Policy Leaves Germans Perplexed
- Found: The Best Free People Deals Under $50, Featuring Savings Up to 92% Off & Styles Starting at Just $6
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Why Florence Pugh Will Likely Never Address Don’t Worry Darling Drama
Ranking
- Olympic men's basketball bracket: Results of the 5x5 tournament
- Kate Spade Outlet's Extra 25% off Sale Delivers Cute & Chic Bags -- Score a $259 Purse for $59 & More
- Florence Pugh Addresses Nasty Comments About Her Weight
- A 12-year-old boy fatally shoots a black bear mauling his father during a hunt in western Wisconsin
- Judge says Mexican ex-official tried to bribe inmates in a bid for new US drug trial
- Officials identify 2 men killed in Idaho gas station explosion
- Sean 'Diddy' Combs denied bail again and will remain in jail until trial
- Wagon rolls over at Wisconsin apple orchard injuring about 25 children and adults
Recommendation
A New York Appellate Court Rejects a Broad Application of the State’s Green Amendment
See Jamie Lynn Spears' Teen Daughter Maddie Watson All Dressed Up for Homecoming Court
Authorities find body believed to be suspect in Kentucky highway shooting
America’s political system is under stress as voters and their leaders navigate unfamiliar terrain
Illinois governor calls for resignation of sheriff whose deputy fatally shot Black woman in her home
California’s cap on health care costs is the nation’s strongest. But will patients notice?
60-year-old woman receives third-degree burns while walking off-trail at Yellowstone
Why Florence Pugh Will Likely Never Address Don’t Worry Darling Drama